Hypocritcal!

So, the Repugnicans wish to make hay about the embassy attack which resulted in four dead. Surely va tragic event.



But compared to the twin towers attack. . . Well . . .



That is a bit like the pot calling the kettle black.



Is't it? Add a comment

sample time?

Is it time to start testing candidates for substance abuse?

What sort of better living through chemistry is Willard indulging in?



Add a comment

The Soft Sell . . .

So, now we begin to see the "softer" side of Willard Mitt Romney.



Soft, gentle, "trust me" eyes. Nodding head, with a quirky smile. Selling BS the whole time.



"I tell you, this car was driven only on Sundays, by a little old lady, back and forth to Church". "High miles? Oh, that's nothing for THIS baby . . . Smells of cigarette smoke you say? . . . No, that's the residual incense smoke from services . . . " (see previous paragraph).



And he will deceive many . . .



Add a comment

Debate?

More like a Carnival Side show barker (selling snake oil on the side), versus a bored Professor watching a "whirling dervish".



What is it with Willards metronomic blinking, anyway? He rattles off these intense statements and then sits here staring, unfocused, blinking once a second, with a smirk that says, "OK, answer THAT!".



Obama, tho, let him get away with too much. Americans react all too consistently to a high energy, emotional presentation, the facts be damned. He was way too Gentlemanly, even passive.



And the "moderator". Please. He let Willard M. run on over time, could not seem to raise the gumption to reign him in, but had no problems putting the ruler to Obama's knuckles.



Media bias? In full view last evening. Just analyze the framing of shots and the time each one spoke. Add a comment