- Details
-
Created: Tuesday, 17 December 2019 13:38
-
Written by JoeSeppi
Moscow Mitch McConnell, Power Broker for The Vald and Donnie show, is proving his worth to his masters, to assure himself a lucrative role in the New Order.
By refusing to allow Witnesses to testify, he is making it much easier to railroad through a "No Guilty" Verdict in the upcoming Impeachment Trial.
Will we see the opposite of the Old West Tar and Feathering? Perhaps they will carry Trump out of the Senate on a Golden sedan chair, festooned with Gems of all Nations, proclaiming him the new Orange Julius (Caeser)?
Moscow Mitch had better hope he prevails and he is bound to lose his Senate seat in the next election and that Vlad and Donnie come through on their promises. Well there are always his Wife's rich Chinese relatives to fall back on. After all what more humiliation can there be for someone betraying their Senatorial Oath the way he and Graham are doing.
Kentuckians, do, after all, have a sense of honor and devotion to the Country, despite it all and will turn him out in disgrace.
- Details
-
Created: Friday, 13 December 2019 23:48
-
Written by JoeSeppi
So, Mitch and Donnie are working on the script for the Impeachment trial?
Does that amount to Collusion? Conspiracy? Corruption?
So, McConnell is stating, flat out, the fix is in? The game is rigged?
If a Jury foreman did this out in the real world, he would be prosecuted.
They do seem to think that if they do it "right out in the open" they can get away with it.
Truth, Justice and the American Way. Supermen, they are not.
- Details
-
Created: Monday, 09 December 2019 23:10
-
Written by JoeSeppi
Democrats. Gotta love 'em. Ready to snatch defeat from the jaws of Victory yet again.
Why ignore the Criminal acts committed by Trump? These are easily provable.
Omitting them leaves open the claim that Democrats think such Criminal Acts are acceptable behavior for a Chief Executive.
Not to say "Pile on" with frivolous and tenuous charges, but for those that are clearly Criminal and provable, it would be a grave error to omit them.
- Details
-
Created: Friday, 01 November 2019 10:43
-
Written by JoeSeppi
October 31, 2019, on her MSNBC show, Rachel Maddow made a "big deal" about Missouri's health director, Randall Williams "tracking women's menstrual cycles".
While I may find Missouri's attitude toward abortion Laws to be a bit over the top, I find this segment to be a bit over the top as well.
Rachel repeatedly cited as "proof" Missouri was "tracking women's periods" a reply to a question about a column in a report containing the "calculated last normal period".
This brief clip, such as it was, did not prove her point at all. Recording a single data point does not prove "tracking".
There was no proof given, or any indication that continued tracking of periods was being done, other than Rachel's rather heated comments.
Any competent OB-GYN will also record the "last normal period" as a normal part of pre-natal care.
If this is an indication of what passes for informed and accurate reporting, we might as well watch FOX.